Skip to main content

Subtle Difference Between FAO and EU Regulations on the use of Alternative Medicine in Organic Farming

Unfortunately, organic farming has quite some influences from pseudoscientific ideas. It is not as bad as in biodynamic agriculture, but you can see it for instance in the preference for alternative medicine in treating livestock in the regulations. I was a bit surprised to find out a couple of years ago that there are subtle differences in the international regulations for the organic label. The EU regulations are worse than those from the FAO, if you compare those from the perspective of animal well-being.

Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 gives in Article 14.1.e.ii the following rules:

The FAO and WHO, on the other hand, have formulated this matter slightly different in their Codex Alimentarius. In The Guidelines for the Production, Processing, Labelling and Marketing of Organically Produced Foods (pdf) we read in article 22:

I hope you spot the difference. According to the EU regulations, a farmer may use regular medicinal products only if the alternatives are inappropriate. But this reads as he must first show in that particular case that it is inappropriate. If there is no clear evidence from scientific research that all the alternatives have failed for similar cases, does this mean he should still try it first anyway? And is he then allowed to use regular medicine, only when the animal doesn’t recover quickly enough using these alternatives? This protocol doesn’t seem to be in the best interest of the animal.

The FAO regulation puts the burden of proof where it should be. According to this regulation, you shall prefer alternative treatments provided that they have been shown to be effective. Also when there is reasonable doubt (point c.: ‘unlikely to be effective’), the farmer may use regular medicine without being afraid that he will lose the organic label for the meat of this animal. In my opinion, this regulation allows sensible organic farmers to completely ignore alternative treatments, as there is no solid evidence at all for these treatments.

Photo credits: ‘The milk cows at the organic farm Marienhof’ by sacratomato_hr | Flickr

Did you enjoy this article? Then please consider to support my blog with a donation.

One thought to “Subtle Difference Between FAO and EU Regulations on the use of Alternative Medicine in Organic Farming”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Your comment might stay in the moderation queue for some time, especially if it is your first comment on this site. Usually all comments will be published, even if they express extreme disagreement with my writing, but I suggest that you find another place to leave rude and offensive comments. Also completely anonymous and non-English comments are not likely to pass moderation. Also read the Privacy Policy.

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.